Quick-Start Guide Premiers in I-Pac
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

An ebook wasn’t enough. It was just not possible to cover all the bases. So, I tried to think of what to do to save even more marriages. Now, I think we have the best solution. We now offer the Save The Marriage I-Pac. My idea is that an I-Pac is an Informational Package. It is the complete solution!

First, we started with the ebook. After all, it has been effective for more than 41,000 couples. But we went several steps further. I added a special document, the Top 5 Mistakes. This document describes the 5 most common mistakes people make when a spouse wants out of a marriage.

Understand, these mistakes can make the difference between a marriage that can be salvaged, and one that is lost. Not huge mistakes, but a misstep at the wrong time, and you lose too much ground.

That still wasn’t enough, so we added another important document: The Quick-Start Guide. This guide will quickly get people on the path to saving their marriage. It helps someone assess where the relationship is (there are 8 stages outlined), and what to do to turn each stage around. Each stage requires a different approach, and this document shows the path.

I’m very excited about this information! I’ve used it with some consultation clients, and have been blown away with the results! I think this provides a whole other layer of effectiveness.

Then, to tie it all together, I have decided that for the time being, each person who purchases the I-Pac will receive an email consultation with me. Ask a question, get a direct response. Until I am overwhelmed with the emails, I’ll keep this up.

I think the email consultation has the capacity of tying it all together, since it allows each person to take the material and apply it to the particulars of his or her marriage. Information, carefully targeted, and we will save even more marriages!

********************
More marriage saving information can be found in my ebook, available by CLICKING HERE.

The Promise Is To Love, Not To Be In Love
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

OK, every now and then, I write in response to people who email me. It is usually after I hear the same question over and over in a short amount of time. Today is one of those days. In fact, just this morning, I heard from someone with whom I have offered consultation. She stated that her husband’s feelings had changed for her, and she knew that meant that she needed to move on.

I strongly disagreed with her perspective. This idea that “I am not in love with you anymore” means the marriage is over, is one of the most destructive myths of marriage. It is inaccurate and unfair to reality.

You see, when most people marry, they promise to love and cherish each other. Unless they did a major re-write of their marriage vows, they did not promise to be “in love” with each other the rest of their lives. But then, when the feeling isn’t there, that is the promise they seem to fall back on.

Love is an action verb. That is what the promise is about. In essence, the vow is “I promise to act in loving ways toward you and to treat you as something I cherish, I treat you as a treasure.” Now that captures the essence of marriage!

Emotions and feelings come and go, sometimes completely out of our control. But the choice, the promise to act loving, that is a different matter. I can make a conscious choice to act loving, even if I don’t have feelings prompting me. When people begin to orient their marriage around being loving and treasuring the other, as a conscious choice, the feelings of being in love will follow.

My guess is that the divorce rate would drop drastically if we could change that one single myth. Marriage is about choosing to love someone, not being blown around by fickle emotions.

********************
More marriage saving information can be found in my ebook, available by CLICKING HERE.

“Don’t Take It Personally”
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.
I was asked in a recent parenting seminar on any rules for dealing with the rollercoaster of teens. I turned and wrote on the board:

Rule 1: Take Nothing Personally

After the chuckles stopped, I added the second rule:

Rule 2: See Rule #1

That was it. That was the extent of the rules. Because it is the “taking it personally” that suddenly makes the conversation go downhill.

In his book, Four Agreements, Miguel Ruiz makes the same point.  One of his agreements is to take nothing personally.  The reason for his suggestion is because nothing is really personal.

When someone tells me he or she is angry with me, that person is saying much more about him- or herself than about me.  Whatever they say is a perception, not necessarily correct or true.

But our response is to become defensive, to react to the attack.  And there is a good reason for that.  Our brain’s most primitive part is designed to detect threat.  It is not designed to be good at assessing whether a threat is actual or not, only that there is a threat.  Brain researchers tell us that there is an area of the brain, the amygdala, that is deep within our brain structure.  It is always scanning for threat. 

Survival depends upon over-reacting.  So, we are better off,  survival-wise, responding to real threat and perceived threat with equal speed and force.  If I am walking down a path and see a crooked stick, my mind registers the possibility of a snake, and I freeze.  Then, the rest of my brain catches up and assesses that it is only a stick.  I move on.  Had it been a snake, but my brain was set to assume it was not a threat, I would have been bitten.  Not good for survival.

Unfortunately, what is good for survival is not so good for personal relationships.  When someone raises their voice to me, or uses critical words, my deepest instintual part sees threat.  And since the person probably doesn’t just stop, my mind continues to register threat.  Suddenly, my body is ready for one of two responses:  fight or flight.  Neither are particularly useful responses in having an intelligent discussion.

So, not taking it personally is a step in stopping that immediate response of fight/flight.  If it is not a personal attack, there is no reason to respond to the attack.  And, of course, as with most things, this is easier said than done.

Make it a spiritual discipline (which means you will have to work at it) to take nothing personally.  Whatever is said, do as your mother said “consider the source.”  And while your mother may have meant it in a somewhat derogatory way toward the other person, in this case, consider the views, feelings, and understandings of the other.  Perhaps the other is having a difficult time.  Perhaps there are some key things that trigger a response in the other.  Perhaps it has just been a misunderstanding.  Unfortunately, misunderstandings can spiral out of control as each misunderstands the other, resulting in resentments, which only increases the potential for misunderstandings.

Take nothing personally.

********************
More marriage saving information can be found in my ebook, available by CLICKING HERE.Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D., is the author of the bestselling relationship ebook, Save The Marriage. It is available at http://www.savethemarriage.com .

What’s The Problem?
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

People often ask me: why do we have so many problems in marriage? From my perspective, it seems that a great deal of the problem comes from two directions.

1) We are raised to take care of ourselves. We are raised to be independent people, unaffected by those around us. Sometimes, the training doesn’t work, and we become people desperate for connection. We live at the extremes: independence or over-dependence. The best advice for marriages is interdependence. Relationships are helped when people are interdependent. In other words, both bring something to the table and add to the other, while still being distinct.

2) Culture plays against marriage. Listen to the songs, watch the TV and movies. We are surrounded by poor images of marriage. In fact, the dominant theme is having affairs and having casual sex. Neither are very healthy and helpful for marriage.

So, the roots are there, and then exacerbated by what we bring to the table. Marriage advice wants to make it some deep fault of each individual, but that is just the flavoring on the steak, not the meat of the issue.

********************
More marriage saving information can be found in my ebook, available by CLICKING HERE.

Malicious Action vs. Self-Protective Action
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

One of the most interesting aspects of my work is that I constantly see people responding to hurt. It is interesting to me that the majority of people always assign maliciousness to an action by someone else. On the other hand, people usually readily see the self-protective nature of their own actions. Social psychologists call this the “attribution error.” We see the other’s action as character flaw, and our actions as mistakes.

I find it important that individuals work to see that there are very few people who are actually malicious. The chances of being married to one are fairly low. But the chances are good that seemingly malicious actions are really rooted in self-protection. When we are hurt, we lash out. The lashing out may feel malicious to the other, much like what we were lashing out against: seemingly malicious actions.

This truth applies to parenting, also. When we are able to view our child’s actions as response to hurt, this requires a different response than when we assume it is from maliciousness. A two year-old is pitching a fit because he or she wants something or is threatened by something, not because he or she is mean.

A teenager may say attacking words, but they are often retaliatory in nature. They may be trying to establish a “self-hood” that they think is being threatened (curfews, groundings, and anything else that reigns in freedom), or may feel slighted. The words coming out may be malicious, but that does not mean the person is malicious.

My daughter loves the bumper sticker that quotes Ghandi: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. . . leaves the world blind and toothless.” What would happen in relationships if we worked from an assumption that the attack from another comes from hurt and pain, not mean-ness? What would happen if we worked from a point of forgiveness? After all, if the person is seen as hurt and in pain, it is much easier to offer forgiveness and understanding.

********************
More marriage saving information can be found in my ebook, available by CLICKING HERE.

Learning To Love
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

My daughter was recently in her school’s performance of Fiddler On The Roof. She was one of the daughters. If you don’t know the story, it focuses on the changing culture of marriage, from one where the marriage is arrainged by family and community to one based on mutual attraction.

In one of the songs, the main character asks his wife if she loves him. She replies that for 25 years, she has shared his bed, made his meals, tended his house, raised his children — so what kind of question is that? The point is, love wasn’t even a question or consideration. But after some back-and-forth, they decide that, indeed, they love each other.

This led me to think about what I know about marriage. And here is what I think about the question of love: we fall in love to get together, then spend the rest of our lives learning to love the other.

You see, the initial attraction is really about “I.” I feel a certain way, so I know I am “in love.” But it is driven by my need to feel that way, my need to be with the other person, my need to have my needs met.

But love is a verb, something I do for the other. So, it takes the rest of my life to learn how to attend to my spouse’s needs. From my desire to be with my spouse comes my desire to meet my spouse’s love needs.

We are “fooled” into commitment by the overwhelming feeling of attraction, then we have to put forth effort to create a sustained relationship. I say “fooled” because our culture has us believeing that this love is the foundation of a relationship. It is not. It is merely a temporary starting point.

My feelings will calm over time. The overwhelming need to be with someone that marks the infatuation portion of a relationship is not sustainable on its own. It’s like placing a flame in a bottle. Eventually, the flame will burn all the oxygen in the bottle and be extinguished.

So, there has to be some “fueling of the fire.” This is “love,” the verb. When I act in loving ways, I fuel the fire, keep it burning. If I stop tending to the other’s needs because I don’t feel that infatuation, the relationship will slowly (or not so slowly) die away.

When we keep believing that “love” (infatuation) is the heart of a relationship, when that feeling is gone, we believe we are no longer in love. That is not the case; we have just failed to fuel the fire.

Reality TV has proven that any two people, given the right circumstances and settings, can fall into love (chemistry of infatuation). But story after story shows that it is harder to make the switch to “true love” that comes from action. Choose action, and don’t be fooled by chemistry.

Stolen Ebook: The Continuing Saga
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

To those of you who wrote to express your concerns about the stolen ebook situation, thank you.

Here is the update: Mr. Cohen refused to reveal himself. Thus, attorneys got involved. Happily, both sites mentioned are currently down. We all recognize that these sites could reappear elsewhere. That is the nature of the internet. As always, we are vigilant to seek out those who might try to steal the intellectual property.

I heard from another website in the process that noted their webcopy had been stolen. So many innocent people have to spend time and energy to work against the dishonest.

ANNOUNCEMENT: My eBook Has Been Stolen
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

Late last week, I discovered that my ebook was once again stolen (third time), and being sold on another website. As with the first two, we are rapidly pursuing legal intervention. Differently than the first two times, this website owner refuses to cooperate. He even refuses to reveal his address or phone number! (You will notice that mine is on my home page.)

Brian Cohen is the owner of www.INeedMarriageHelp.com. If you were to read his letter, you would think that he created the ebook. This is not the case. The document was stolen by someone who claimed to have freelanced it. That person has sold the piece as an original work at least three times.

I believe that Brian Cohen bought the ebook, thinking it was an original piece. To that point, he is innocent. Unfortunately, even when faced with evidence to the contrary, Mr. Cohen refuses to remove his copyright infringement.

There are two ironies to this. First, Mr. Cohen is selling his ebook at twice the price of mine! I have attempted to keep my ebook reasonably priced, while others are charging 2, 3, even 4 times as much.

The second irony is that Mr. Cohen is finding people through a website that purports to rate online products, www.toponlineproducts.com. What is most interesting about this is that the website is a paid inclusion site. They do not review the products. Instead, they charge the sites “reviewed” for each person that goes to that site. You can tell the difference between those paying and those being used as “straw men,” because those sites that don’t pay (and therefore get poor reviews) say “review pending.”

Those that created this site know that someone visiting will not wait for a review to appear. They trust the site, and get taken. The irony for me is that www.INeedMarriageHelp.com gets a number 1 review. Glowing review, it says. My site has a poor review. And here is what reveals the falseness of this site: the same book is supposedly reviewed, since that site is actually selling mine!

Some people will say that I am only airing dirty laundry. Unfortunately, Mr. Cohen has opted to cease discussions with me. My attorney will now be involved. I am using the same vehicle that hides Mr. Cohen to reveal him (the internet).

What NOT To Do #6
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

Number 6 on my top list of what NOT to do when a spouse or partner says he or she is done with the relationship is. . . Don’t Waste Time.

Often, when something traumatic happens, we have a tendency to become paralyzed into inactivity. In fact, I have had some people who did nothing until the divorce papers were delivered a year or more after the initial “I’m not happy” discussion.

DON’T DO THAT!!! It is something like deciding not to go to the doctor when you first cut yourself, but instead waiting until it is so infected that amputation is the only option.

Time is of the essence. That doesn’t mean “go into panic mode” (my #1 Don’t Do). It means you activate yourself. Find the resources that will help you. Take action to change the situation. Relationships can be turned around at any time.

So, by now, you may be wondering where #’s 1-5 are. You can get that article FOR FREE, by going to the Save The Marriage website, and entering your first name and email address into the drop-down that comes into view when the page loads (don’t worry, you can’t miss it). It will be emailed to you instantly.

There it is, your first action. Go get the article and get started saving your relationship!

Looking For A Role Model?
150 150 Lee H. Baucom, Ph.D.

I spend my days with people who are not happy in their marriage. Perhaps this is why it is so refreshing when I find a couple thrilled to be together. We all need role models. Some of us never had a role model; perhaps there was no happy marriage to see growing up.

Well, this morning, I was tuned into NPR‘s Morning Edition. I always look forward to their report on Story Corps. If you are not familiar, this is a program that started in New York City. People could enter into a soundproof room, and either tell their story or interview someone else to hear their story. These stories are an oral history, and are being collected by the Library of Congress.

One couple that entered that booth has become the “poster children” for the program. Danny and Annie Perasa are that couple. They embody the program’s storytelling, but also embody a loving relationship. If you did not catch the story, treat yourself by reading and listening by clicking here.

Danny is dying from cancer, but their love is clearly undying.